Cases 1 - 6 of 6
FREE SPEECH COALITION, INC. et al v. ROKITA, in his official capacity as the Attorney General of the State of Indiana
as 1:2024cv00980
Plaintiff:
FREE SPEECH COALITION, INC., AYLO PREMIUM LTD, AYLO FREESITES LTD and others
Defendant:
TODD ROKITA, in his official capacity as the Attorney General of the State of Indiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Jane Doe v. Aylo Holdings S.A.R.L. et al
as 2:2024cv03267
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
Aylo Holdings S.A.R.L., Aylo Freesites, Ltd. Guardian Ad Litem f/k/a MG Freesites, Ltd. Guardian Ad Litem d/b/a Pornhub, Aylo Usa Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
DISH Technologies L.L.C. et al v. Aylo Freesites Ltd et al
as 2:2024cv00066
Plaintiff:
DISH Technologies L.L.C. and Sling TV L.L.C.
Defendant:
Aylo Freesites Ltd and 9219-1568 Quebec Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 0271 Patent Infringement
Aylo Freesites Ltd v. DISH Technologies L.L.C. et al
as 1:2024cv00086
Plaintiff:
Aylo Freesites Ltd and MG Freesites Ltd
Defendant:
DISH Technologies L.L.C., EchoStar Technologies L.L.C. and Sling T.V. L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
WellcomeMat, LLC v. Aylo Holdings S. r.l. et al
as 2:2023cv00483
Defendant:
Aylo Holdings S. r.l., Aylo Freesites, Ltd., Aylo Premium, Ltd. and others
Plaintiff:
WellcomeMat, LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Jane Doe Nos. 60 through 121 v. Aylo Media S.A.R.L. et al
as 3:2023cv01821
Defendant:
Aylo Media S.A.R.L., Aylo Freesites, Ltd. a foreign entity formerly known as MG Freesites, Ltd. doing business as PornHub doing business as YouPorn doing business as RedTube doing business as Tube8, Aylo Billing US Corp. a Delaware corporation formerly known as MG Billing US Corp. doing business as ProBiller and others
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe Nos. 60 through 121
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Civil Remedies: Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
