Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv04977
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1105 (a) Aliens: Habeas Corpus to Release INS Det
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv04976
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1105 (a) Aliens: Habeas Corpus to Release INS Det
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv04943
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Tejada v. New York City Police 71 Pct Brooklyn 11225
as 26-1882
Petitioner:
REBERTO ALMONTA TEJADA and Jose Luis Molina
Respondent:
NEW YORK CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT, 71st Pct. Brooklyn 11225, JOHN DOE KENBERLY, TA Police 968404, Varick Street Branch, ERICA GRANT, 71st Pct. and others
ONeill v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 7:2026cv05811
Plaintiff:
Hope Ann ONeill
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Lauren Hughes et al v. Apple, Inc.
as 2:2026cv07457
Plaintiff:
Lauren Hughes, Jane Doe, Roger Derick Hembd and others
Defendant:
Apple Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv04768
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1105 (a) Aliens: Habeas Corpus to Release INS Det
Riley v. Blanche
as 26-1743
Petitioner:
GEORGE ONEIL RILEY and George Riley
Respondent:
TODD BLANCHE, ACTING UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Dowling v. Sharp et al
as 9:2026cv80770
Plaintiff:
Margaret G. Dowling
Defendant:
David Sharp, Renee Blaize, Artuo Calderon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Scarborough v. Bennett et al
as 4:2026cv02313
Plaintiff:
Matthew Paul Scarborough
Defendant:
LT. Bennett and Sergant Oneil
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
