Cases 1 - 10 of 49
Beydoun et al v. Rosenthal et al
as 4:2023cv13163
Plaintiff:
Sam Beydoun and B&D Family Holdings LLC
Defendant:
Bruce Rosenthal, Bruce Rosenthal PLLC, Robert Ficano and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Ewing v. Fiore et al
as 3:2023cv01616
Plaintiff:
Anton A. Ewing
Defendant:
Daniel Fiore and B&D Consultants, Inc.
Arnold v. US
as 23-1951
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN ARNOLD, SUSAN BOLEK, H. DRAKE GEBHARD and others
Plaintiff:
B&D FARMS, INC., H. KENT EUHUS LIVING TRUST, DIANA EUHUS LIVING TRUST and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Samsung SDI Co., Ltd. v. B.D.
as 22-8020
Petitioner:
SAMSUNG SDI CO., LTD.
Respondent:
B. D., a minor, by and through his guardian ad litem, BRYAN MYERS
B.D.G. v. Choice Hotels International, Inc.
as 2:2022cv03202
Plaintiff:
B. D. G.
Defendant:
Choice Hotels International, Inc.
Incorrectly Filed v. Incorrectly Filed
as 3:2022cv00279
Plaintiff:
Fred Rahdar and Incorrectly Filed
Defendant:
Kobra Ghorbani, City of Friendswood, B Milling and others
Cause Of Action: 88 U.S.C. § 8888 Other Statutory Actions
Incorrectly Filed v. Incorrectly Filed
as 3:2022cv00278
Plaintiff:
Fred Rahdar, Kobra Ghorbani and Incorrectly Filed
Defendant:
B Milling, J Dement, M A Kulhanek and others
Cause Of Action: 88 U.S.C. § 8888 Other Statutory Actions
Incorrectly Filed v. Incorrectly Filed
as 3:2022cv00277
Plaintiff:
Fred Rhadar, Kobra Ghorbani and Incorrectly Filed
Defendant:
City of Friendswood Texas, b milling, M Kulhanek and others
Cause Of Action: 88 U.S.C. § 8888 Other Statutory Actions
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01390
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Steve Riddick v. Penny McCowan
as 21-7386
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STEVE RIDDICK, a/k/a Steven Riddick
Defendant / Appellee:
LIEUTENANT PENNY MCCOWAN, ASSISTANT WARDEN SHANNON FULLER, UNIT MANAGER LARRY COLLINS and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
