Cases 1 - 10 of 51
Candy Club, LLC v. B. Davis Distributing, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv07933
Plaintiff:
Candy Club, LLC
Defendant:
B. Davis Distributing, Inc. d/b/a The Nut Garden, a Utah Corporation, Brett Davis, Janae Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
(PC) Wilson v. Mercado et al
as 1:2022cv00278
Plaintiff:
David Wayne Wilson
Defendant:
Gabino Mercado, California Substance Abuse Treatment Facility, B. Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Bonta
as 3:2021cv02042
Petitioner:
Gavin B. Davis
Respondent:
Rob Bonta
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
(PC) Grzeslo v. Fisher et al
as 1:2021cv01371
Plaintiff:
James Grzeslo
Defendant:
Raythel Fisher, Jr., B. Davi, E. Castillo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Allen v. Dean et al
as 1:2021cv01150
Plaintiff:
James D. Allen and Llord J.P. Allen
Defendant:
Rashuan Q. Dean, Gracian, T. Plumlee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Davis v. Phui et al
as 1:2020cv00276
Plaintiff:
Kelly B. Davis
Defendant:
Yaguezi and Dr. Phui
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States of America v. 129,780.00 in U.S. Currency
as 2:2019cv10399
Defendant:
$129,780.00 IN U.S. CURRENCY and 129,780.00 in U.S. Currency
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Claimant:
Clayton B Davis
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
Davis v. State of California
as 3:2019cv02263
Respondent:
State of California, Officer Adolfo Gonzales and Stephanie Rue
Petitioner:
Gavin B. Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Davis v. Adler et al
as 3:2019cv00834
Plaintiff:
Gavin B. Davis
Defendant:
Cornell University, Sami Rashid, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Davis v. Sanchez et al
as 3:2019cv00815
Defendant:
State of Texas, Bexar County (Texas) and Yohanna Sanchez
Plaintiff:
Gavin B. Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 cv
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
