Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Frank et al v. Walker et al
as 3:2020cv00768
Plaintiff:
Shirley Brown, Sarah Lahti, Nancy Lea Wilde and others
Defendant:
Thomas Cane, Mark L. Thomsen, Beverly R Gill and others
Amicus Curiae:
United States Justice Foundation, Matthew Augustine, Erin M Decker and others
Intervenor Defendant:
The Wisconsin Legislature
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
May v. Judd et al
as 1:2018cv01109
Defendant:
M. Ortiz, G. Franco, B. Judd and others
Plaintiff:
Joshua Everett May and Joshua May
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
(PC) Faultry v. Saechao et al
as 2:2018cv01850
Defendant:
M. Shirley, B. Judd, L. Obrian and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Faultry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kisor v. Judd et al
as 1:2017cv00381
Plaintiff:
T. R. Kisor
Defendant:
B. Judd, Core Civic, Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Escarcega v. Corrections Company of America et al
as 1:2017cv00335
Plaintiff:
Nathanael Escarcega
Defendant:
Corrections Company of America, B. Judd, J. Lopez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pellot-Castellano v. Arnone et al
as 3:2012cv01518
Plaintiff:
Kenyon L. Joseph Pellot-Castellano
Defendant:
Leo Arnone, Scott Erfe, Edward Maldonado and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Frank et al v. Walker et al
as 2:2011cv01128
Plaintiff:
Ruthelle Frank , Carl Ellis , Justin Luft and others
Defendant:
Scott Walker , Thomas Barland , Gerald Nichol and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Spring et al v. Stepp et al
as 2:2011cv00366
Plaintiff:
Charles Spring and Helen F Findley
Defendant:
Cathy Stepp , Patrick Stevens , Lynne B Judd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 7604
Kapelioujnyi v. Vaughn et al
as 1:2009cv00866
Plaintiff:
Ostap Kapelioujnyi
Defendant:
L. Vaughn, B. Judd and Corrections Corporation of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
