Cases 1 - 10 of 52
Johnson v. Satsuma Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00565
Plaintiff:
William Johnson
Defendant:
Satsuma Pharmaceuticals, Inc., John Kollins, Heath Lukatch and others
Ballard v. Satsuma Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00544
Plaintiff:
William Ballard
Defendant:
Satsuma Pharmaceuticals, Inc., John Kollins, Heath Lukatch and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00626
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Rajul Ruhbayan v. Rebecca Smith
as 21-7419
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RAJUL RUHBAYAN
Defendant / Appellee:
REBECCA BEACH SMITH, District Judge, ROBERT B. KING, Appeal Judge, ALLYSON K. DUNCAN, Appeal Judge and others
David Meyers v. M. Williams
as 21-6923
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, U. S. DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY FINANCIAL CENTER KANSAS CITY, MO, MS. SPIVEY and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
United States Securities and Exchange Commission v. Legacy Group, Inc, The et al
as 1:2021cv01404
Defendant:
Andrea S. Trout, Matthew B. King, Randy R. King and others
Plaintiff:
United States Securities and Exchange Commission
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Nathaniel King v. Andrew Saul
as 21-1113
Defendant / Appellee:
ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NATHANIEL B. KING
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00734
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Rajul Ruhbayan v. Rebecca Smith
as 20-6524
Defendant / Appellee:
ALLYSON K. DUNCAN, Judge, REBECCA BEACH SMITH, Judge, WILLIAM WALTER WILKINS, Judge and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RAJUL RUHBAYAN
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv10830
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
