Cases 21 - 30 of 46
Williams v. Bossen et al
as 3:2014cv01036
Plaintiff:
Anthony Williams
Defendant:
Michael Bossen, Charles W. Arnold, Angela B. Corey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Botero et al v. Legend Industries, Inc. et al
as 0:2013cv61458
Plaintiff:
Juan Botero and Angelica Porras
Defendant:
Legend Industries, Inc. , B&L Machine Sales, Inc. , B&L Machine Sales and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Product Liability
Augustin v. B & L Service, Inc.
as 0:2012cv62128
Plaintiff:
Mackenson Augustin
Defendant:
B & L Service, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv02097
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Barber et al v. Alabama, State of et al
as 2:2011cv03249
Plaintiff:
Donald Joe Barber and Joshua Allen Barber
Defendant:
Alabama, State of , Jefferson County , Alfred Bahakel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Headley v. City of Steele et al
as 4:2011cv02659
Plaintiff:
Pamela Headley
Defendant:
City of Steele, B. L. McCracken, Jimmy Morris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Forte et al v. B & L Bonding Co. et al
as 2:2011cv00539
Plaintiff:
Hazel Forte and Porchia Forte Thornton
Defendant:
B & L Bonding Co., Byron Sands, Michael Stoops and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kleparek v. Masony
as 2:2011cv00037
Plaintiff:
Gerald Kleparek
Defendant:
B. L. Masony
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Transworld Group Limited v. Affordable Bio Feedstock, Inc. et al
as 6:2010cv01467
Plaintiff:
Transworld Group Limited
Defendant:
Affordable Bio Feedstock, Inc., Florida Biodiesel Fuel, Inc., B & L Investments of Orlando, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 10-13909
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
