Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Boyette v. B.O.P. Sullivan County Jail et al
as 2:2023cv00021
Plaintiff:
Kevin Boyette
Defendant:
B.O.P. Sullivan County Jail, Christy, C.O. Phillips and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Banner v. B.O.P.
as 6:2022cv00160
Petitioner:
Homer Banner
Respondent:
B.O.P.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Daniel et al v. Neff et al
as 2:2021cv02511
Plaintiff:
Thaddeus D: Daniel and Wenona Calloway Daniel
Defendant:
Steven S: Neff, Christopher D: Poole, Deanora J: Hinton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Beard v. Dismis Charities Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv00028
Defendant:
Dismis Charities Inc., Mr. Norman, Mr. Haydon and others
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Ray Beard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chambers v. Ebbert
as 2:2019cv02819
Petitioner:
Demarcus L. Chambers
Respondent:
("The B.O.P.") United States Penitentiary Lewisburg and Warden David J Ebbert
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Johnson v. Doe et al
as 3:2016cv02740
Plaintiff:
Marcus Johnson
Defendant:
Jane and John Doe, Lisa Ownby, Any and all Supervisors in the Board of parole and T.D.O.C. in Collusion and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Harding et al
as 3:2016cv00084
Plaintiff:
Marcus T. Johnson
Defendant:
Marcedes Harding, Derrick Schofield, B.O.P. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cox v. United States of America et al
as 3:2015cv00392
Petitioner:
Montarius Cox
Respondent:
United States of America, Attorney General and B.O.P.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Demetrius Hill v. Harley Lappin, et al
as 12-6561
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DEMETRIUS HILL
Defendant - Appellee:
HARLEY G. LAPPIN, Director, B.O.P. Director, MCLEOD, Associate Warden, McCreary, HUFF, Warden, S.I.A. McCreary and others
Avendano v. B.O.P. Director et al
as 4:2012cv03045
Plaintiff:
Hilario Garcia Avendano
Defendant:
B.O.P. Director, Pugh, D. Hivner and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
