Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 44
Larry Klayman v. Suzanne Jambe, et al
as 16-12103
Plaintiff - Appellee: LARRY E. KLAYMAN
Defendant - Appellant: SUZANNE JAMBE, JAMES ROLLINSON, BAKER HOSTETLER and others
Larry Klayman v. Stephanie Deluca, et al
as 16-11822
Plaintiff - Appellant-Cross Appellee: LARRY KLAYMAN
Defendant - Appellee: STEPHANIE DELUCA
Defendant - Appellee-Cross Appellant: HEWITT SHAW, SUZANNE JAMBE, JAMES ROLLINSON and others
Larry Klayman v. Stephanie Deluca, et al
as 16-11822
Defendant / Appellant: HEWITT SHAW, BAKER HOSTETLER, JAMES ROLLINSON and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: LARRY E. KLAYMAN
Defendant: STEPHANIE DELUCA
Klayman v. Deluca et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 9:2015cv80310
Plaintiff: Klayman and Larry Klayman
Defendant: Deluca, Suzanne Jambe, Baker Hostetler and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Klayman v. Deluca et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2014cv03190
Plaintiff: Larry Elliot Klayman
Defendant: Stephanie A. Luck Deluca , Suzanne Jambe , James Rollinson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Campbell Harrison & Dagley, et al v. Albert Hill, III, et al
as 14-10507
Intervenor Plaintiff - Appellee: LISA BLUE, BARON AND BLUE, CHARLA ALDOUS, doing business as Aldous Law Firm and others
Defendant - Appellant: ALBERT G. HILL, III, Individually, and as a Beneficiary of the Margaret Hunt Trust Estate, derivatively on behalf of the Margaret Hunt Trust Estate, individually, As a beneficiary of the Haroldson Lafayette Hunt, Jr. Trust Estate, and derivatively on beha and ERIN NANCE HILL
Type: Other Statutes RICO
Campbell Harrison & Dagley, et al v. Albert Hill, III, et al
as 14-10507
Intervenor Plaintiff: BAKER & HOSTETLER, L.L.P., PBL MULTI-STRATEGY FUND, L.P., CHARLA ALDOUS, doing business as Aldous Law Firm and others
Defendant / Appellant: ERIN NANCE HILL and ALBERT G. HILL, III, Individually, and as a Beneficiary of the Margaret Hunt Trust Estate, derivatively on behalf of the Margaret Hunt Trust Estate, individually, As a beneficiary of the Haroldson Lafayette Hunt, Jr. Trust Estate, and derivatively on
Type: Other Statutes RICO
In Re: Bernard L. Madoff
as 13-4106
Petitioner: Securities Investor Protection Corporation, HHI Investment Trust #2 and Defendants Listed on Exhibit A, c/o Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP, 919 Third Avenue, New York, NY 10022, (212) 756-2000 and Irving H. Picard, Baker & Hostetler, LLP, 45 Rockefeller Plaza New York, NY 10111, (212) 589-4200
Respondent: Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities, LLC.
Defendant: Evenstad Family Defendants, Tereo Trust Company Limited, 83 Front Street, Hamilton HM 12, Bermuda, Regulus Asset Management Ltd., 6 Front Street, Hamilton HM 11, Bermuda and others
United States of America v. Prevezon Holdings Ltd. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2013cv06326
Defendant: Prevezon Holdings Ltd., Prevezon 1810, L.L.C., ANY AND ALL FUNDS ON DEPOSIT IN BANK OF AMERICA ACCOUNT NUMBER **********6021 HELD IN THE NAME OF PREVEZON SEVEN USA LLC and others
Petitioner: Victoria Tarantino Consulting LLC, Hermitage Capital Management Ltd., Sundance Aspen, LLC and others
Claimant: Martash Holdings, IKR and Denis Katsyv
Interested Party: HSBC Private Bank (Suisse) S.A., Baker & Hostetler LLP and Hermitage Global Partners LP
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider: Any and All Assets of Prevezon Soho USA, L.L.C. incl;uding but not limited to any and all funds on deposit in bank of america acct # 483016158084
Plaintiff: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 981 Civil Forfeiture
LARRY PITT & ASSOCIATES v. LUNDY LAW, LLP et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2013cv02398
Defendant: TITAN OUTDOOR LLC,, L. LEONARD LUNDY and LUNDY LAW, LLP
Petitioner: DLA PIPER LLP (US), DR. DARREN LUGIANO, ESQUIRE CARL W. HITTINGER and others
Plaintiff: LARRY PITT & ASSOCIATES
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?