Cases 1 - 10 of 86
Singh v. Garland
as 24-815
Petitioner:
BALJIT SINGH
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv06089
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
DODG Corporation et al v. Colony Insurance Company et al
as 3:2023cv05673
Plaintiff:
DODG Corporation, Baljit Singh Mann, Surinder Kaur Mann and others
Defendant:
Colony Insurance Company, AMCO Insurance Company and Ohio Security Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
(PC) Singh v. CDCR et al
as 2:2023cv01624
Plaintiff:
Baljit Singh
Defendant:
CDCR, MCSP Staff, Bradley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
First-Citizen Bank and Trust Company v. HD Carriers, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv05890
Plaintiff:
FIRST-CITIZEN BANK & TRUST COMPANY and First-Citizen Bank and Trust Company
Defendant:
HD CARRIERS, INC. and Baljit Singh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Singh v. Garland
as 23-6301
Petitioner:
BALJIT SINGH
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Batth Transport, Inc. v. The Toronto Dominion Bank et al
as 6:2023cv03072
Plaintiff:
Batth Transport, Inc.
Defendant:
The Toronto Dominion Bank, Shan Freightway, Inc. and Brah Baljit Singh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
BMO Harris Bank N.A. v. Ground Link Express Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00226
Plaintiff:
BMO Harris Bank N.A.
Defendant:
Ground Link Express Inc. and Baljit Singh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Malhi v. Garland
as 23-17
Petitioner:
BALJIT SINGH MALHI
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Singh v. Garland
as 22-6561
Petitioner:
BALJIT SINGH
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
