Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Banoro Garrett v. Sentara Norfolk General
as 17-1254
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BANORO GARRETT
Defendant - Appellee:
SENTARA NORFOLK GENERAL HOSPITAL, JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF TIDEWATER, DEBRA S. HOLROYD, Esq. and others
Garrett v. Sentara Norfolk General Hospital et al
as 2:2016cv00713
Plaintiff:
Banoro Garrett
Defendant:
Sentara Norfolk General Hospital, Jewish Family Services of Tidewater, Debra S. Holroyd, Esq. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Banoro Garrett v. R. Weiler
as 14-1364
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BANORO GARRETT
Defendant - Appellee:
LIEUTENANT R. H. WEILER, SERGEANT R. D. LEWIS, ROBERT J. MCCABE and others
Defendant:
NORFOLK POLICE DEPARTMENT, NORFOLK SHERIFF'S OFFICE, THE CITY OF NORFOLK and others
Banoro Garrett v. The Norfolk Police Department
as 13-1092
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BANORO GARRETT
Defendant - Appellee:
NORFOLK POLICE DEPARTMENT, NORFOLK SHERIFF'S OFFICE, THE CITY OF NORFOLK and others
Garrett v. Norfolk Police et al
as 2:2012cv00295
Plaintiff:
Banoro Garrett
Defendant:
Norfolk Police, Norfolk's Sherriff's Office and The City of Norfolk, etc. al
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banoro Garrett v. Sorento Burns
as 09-2396
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BANORO GARRETT and CURTEL GARRETT
Defendant - Appellee:
SORENTO BURNS, ASHTON HARRIS PULLY, JR. and GREAGORY W. KLEIN
v. Garrett et al
as 2:2009cv00558
Defendant:
Banoro Garrett and Sorento Burns
Cause Of Action: no cause specified
Banoro Garrett v. Gene Johnson
as 08-7979
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BANORO GARRETT
Defendant - Appellee:
GENE M. JOHNSON, Director, VA. Dept. of Corrections
Garrett v. Johnson
as 2:2008cv00318
Plaintiff:
Banoro Garrett
Defendant:
Gene M. Johnson
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Garrett v. Johnson
as 07-7231
Petitioner - Appellant:
BANORO GARRETT
Respondent - Appellee:
GENE M. JOHNSON, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
