Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Porter v. Starks et al
as 2:2024cv00034
Plaintiff:
Reginald Darnell Porter
Defendant:
Christopher Starks, Mark S Watson, Natalie Bokota and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Porter v. Crook et al
as 2:2024cv00033
Plaintiff:
Reginald Darnell Porter
Defendant:
Katie Crook, Daniel Martinez, Gabe Acevedo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mussman v. D.A. Dodd Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv00293
Plaintiff:
Rhys Mussman
Defendant:
D.A. Dodd Inc., Scott M. Keller, Natasha A. Burkett and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Illinois State Bar Association Mutual Insurance Company v. Sharkey et al
as 3:2017cv00421
Plaintiff:
Illinois State Bar Association Mutual Insurance Company
Defendant:
Patricia F. Sharkey, John C. & Maureen G. Osborne Revocable Family Trust , Timothy J. Voortman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KONRATH v. CLIENT'S FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE FUND OF THE INDIANA STATE BAR ASSOCIATION
as 1:2017cv00053
Defendant:
CLIENT'S FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE FUND OF THE INDIANA STATE BAR ASSOCIATION
Plaintiff:
GREGORY KONRATH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KONRATH v. CLIENT'S FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE FUND OF THE INDIANA STATE BAR ASSOCIATION
as 1:2016cv03185
Defendant:
CLIENT'S FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE FUND OF THE INDIANA STATE BAR ASSOCIATION
Plaintiff:
GREGORY KONRATH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KORNRATH v. ILLINOIS STATE BAR ASSOCIATION
as 1:2016cv03009
Defendant:
ILLINOIS STATE BAR ASSOCIATION
Plaintiff:
GREGORY KONRATH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KENTUCKY BAR ASSOCIATION v. CHESLEY
as 1:2013mc00033
Respondent:
STANLEY M. CHESLEY
Petitioner:
KENTUCKY BAR ASSOCIATION
Curry v. Thoma et al
as 1:2012cv00173
Plaintiff:
Donte Curry
Defendant:
Mark A Thoma and Allen County Bar Association
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
