Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Sill v. Appalachian Regional Healthcare, Inc.
as 5:2024cv00082
Plaintiff:
Glen Davis Sill
Defendant:
Appalachian Regional Healthcare, Inc. doing business as Beckley ARH Hospital
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Medical Malpractice
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00672
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
ADVOCATE CHRIST MEDICAL CENTER et al v. BECERRA
as 1:2022cv01328
Plaintiff:
ADVOCATE CHRIST MEDICAL CENTER, ADVOCATE ILLINOIS MASONIC MEDICAL CENTER, ADVOCATE LUTHERAN GENERAL HOSPITAL and others
Defendant:
XAVIER BECERRA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
ADVOCATE CHRIST MEDICAL CENTER et al v. BECERRA
as 1:2021cv01651
Plaintiff:
ADVOCATE LUTHERAN GENERAL HOSPITAL, AVERA MCKENNAN HOSPITAL & UNIVERSITY HEALTH CENTER, AURORA SHEBOYGAN MEMORIAL MEDICAL CENTER and others
Defendant:
Secretary XAVIER BECERRA and XAVIER BECERRA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
ADVOCATE BROMENN REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER et al v. ALEX M. AZAR II
as 1:2019cv03751
Plaintiff:
ADVOCATE LUTHERAN GENERAL HOSPITAL, AVERA MCKENNAN HOSPITAL & UNIVERSITY HEALTH CENTER, AURORA SHEBOYGAN MEMORIAL MEDICAL CENTER and others
Defendant:
ALEX M. AZAR II
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Peder Halvorson v. Beckley ARH Hospital
as 13-2157
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PEDER DAWAYNE HALVORSON
Defendant - Appellee:
BECKLEY ARH HOSPITAL, Beckley, WV 25802
Peder Halvorson v. P. Puranik
as 13-2155
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PEDER DAWAYNE HALVORSON
Defendant - Appellee:
P. PURANIK and BECKLEY ARH HOSPITAL
Halvorson v. Beckley ARH Hospital
as 5:2012cv05432
Plaintiff:
Peder Halvorson
Defendant:
Beckley ARH Hospital
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Halvorson v. Puranik et al
as 5:2012cv05430
Plaintiff:
Peder Halvorson
Defendant:
P. Puranik and Beckley ARH Hospital
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
