Cases 1 - 10 of 55
Beery v. State of Iowa
as 4:2024cv00176
Petitioner:
Douglas Beery
Respondent:
State of Iowa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01555
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Beery v. GlaxoSmithKline (America) Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv18449
Plaintiff:
James Beery
Defendant:
GlaxoSmithKline (America) Inc., GlaxoSmithKline LLC, GlaxoSmithKline PLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00057
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
DAVIS et al v. MTN GROUP LIMITED et al
as 1:2022cv00829
Plaintiff:
GUY L DAVIS, TERESITA R DAVIS, AYLA M DAVIS and others
Defendant:
MTN GROUP LIMITED, MTN IRANCELL TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICES COMPANY, PHUTHUMA NHLEKO and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2331 Anti-terrorism Act
MARTINO et al v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
as 1:2021cv01808
Plaintiff:
ROBERT MARTINO, SYBIL MARTINO, DOROTHY ACKLIN and others
Defendant:
ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A
BEERY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv57417
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JESSICA BEERY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Roger Beery v. Comm of Social Security
as 20-3039
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROGER A. BEERY
Defendant / Appellee:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
BEERY v. ABBOTT LABORATORIES et al
as 2:2019cv09695
Plaintiff:
JAN B. BEERY
Defendant:
TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC., ABBOTT LABORATORIES, TAKEDA DEVELOPMENT CENTER AMERICAS, INC. F/K/A TAKEDA GLOBAL RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT CENTER, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
