Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Bernard Jones v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2023cv05626
Defendant:
3M Company, The, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company and others
Plaintiff:
Bernard Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Glenn v. Coffey et al
as 1:2017cv01768
Plaintiff:
Andres L. Glenn
Defendant:
Felehia Coffey, James Cocran, Benchers Early and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. McCall et al
as 0:2013cv01702
Plaintiff:
Anthony Bernard Jones, Sr
Defendant:
Michael McCall, Peggy E Spivey, McDonald and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Glenn v. Jones
as 3:2012cv02682
Plaintiff:
Andres Leroy Glenn
Defendant:
Bernard Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Sumter Lee Reginal Detention Center et al
as 0:2012cv00915
Plaintiff:
Anthony Bernard Jones, Sr
Defendant:
Sumter Lee Reginal Detention Center, Latermore Wilder, Shift Sgt Tomlin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. DeWitt et al
as 6:2010cv01570
Plaintiff:
Ronald Bernard Jones
Defendant:
H Wayne DeWitt, Capt McElvogue, Sgt Jacumin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. DeWitt et al
as 6:2010cv01069
Plaintiff:
Ronald Bernard Jones
Defendant:
H Wayne DeWitt and Sgt Sanders
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Shuler
as 6:2010cv00158
Plaintiff:
Ronald Bernard Jones
Defendant:
K Shuler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Jones v. SC Dept of Corrections et al
as 3:2009cv03120
Plaintiff:
Christopher Bernard Jones
Defendant:
SC Dept of Corrections and Jon Ozmint
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Jones v. SC Dept of Corrections et al
as 1:2009cv03120
Plaintiff:
Christopher Bernard Jones
Defendant:
SC Dept of Corrections , Jon Ozmint , Rose Phipps and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
