Cases 1 - 10 of 47
Berry v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2024cv01088
Plaintiff:
Robin Berry
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Berry et al v. Walz et al
as 0:2024cv00962
Petitioner:
Cederic Lamont Berry and Cedric Lamont Berry
Respondent:
Tim Walz and Paul Schnell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Schnell et al
as 0:2023cv03831
Plaintiff:
Andrew Stephen Williams
Defendant:
Paul Schnell, Terrell Backes, Cheri Grott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clayborne v. Minnesota Department of Corrections, The et al
as 0:2023cv03612
Plaintiff:
Jay Rodney Richard Clayborne
Defendant:
Minnesota Department of Corrections, The, Brian Collins, Kristina Rish and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Alexander et al v. 3M Company
as 0:2023cv02616
Plaintiff:
Melissa Alexander, Michael Wayne Allen, Alan Alsop and others
Defendant:
3M Company
Berry v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2023cv01039
Plaintiff:
Katherine Berry
Defendant:
3M Company, Arizant Healthcare Inc and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Williamsen-Berry v. United of Omaha Life Insurance Company
as 0:2022cv01263
Plaintiff:
Tora Williamsen-Berry
Defendant:
United of Omaha Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Goldmann et al v. Sherburne County Sheriffs Department et al
as 0:2021cv02530
Plaintiff:
Steven Goldmann, Romelle Smith, Mohamed Hussein and others
Defendant:
Sherburne County Sheriffs Department, Joel Brott, Donald Starry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Beeman Berry Farm, LLC v. Bayer Cropscience LP et al
as 0:2021cv00719
Defendant:
Corteva, Inc., Federated Co-Operatives Ltd., Bayer Cropscience LP and others
Plaintiff:
Beeman Berry Farm, LLC
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Berry v. Saul et al
as 0:2020cv02631
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Plaintiff:
Christopher J. Berry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
