Civil Rights Cases filed in the Fourth Circuit Courts
Cases 31 - 40 of 117
Michele Minor v. Prince George's County, MD
as 17-1322
Plaintiff - Appellant: MICHELE E. MINOR, Personally and as the Personal Representative of the Estate of Michael R. Minor and KIRA R. SIMMONS, As the Next Best Friend of MJM, a Minor
Defendant - Appellee: SHERIFF MELVIN C. HIGH, DEPUTY SHERIFF KENDAL WADE and PRINCE GEORGE'S COUNTY, MARYLAND
Crowder v. Hoose et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2016cv00773
Plaintiff: Robert L Crowder, Jr
Defendant: Randall Hoose, Melissa Rivenbark, Chip Pennell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv01168
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 16-1996
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Morrow v. Best Buy Stores L.P.
as 1:2016cv00271
Plaintiff: Anette M Morrow
Defendant: Best Buy Stores, L.P.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Morrow v. Bes Buy, et al
as 3:2016cv00605
Plaintiff: Anette M Morrow
Defendant: Best Buy Stores, L.P.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2016cv02514
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
W.S. v. Daniels et al
as 8:2016cv01280
Plaintiff: W.S.
Defendant: Cassandra Daniels , Ursula Best and South Carolina Department of Social Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
W.S. v. Daniels et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 8:2016cv01032
Plaintiff: W.S.
Defendant: Cassandra Daniels , Ursula Best , South Carolina Department of Social Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 15-2034
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?