Cases 21 - 30 of 73
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-2299
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
William S. Davis, Jr. v. Charlotte Mitchel
as 13-2081
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM SCOTT DAVIS, II, as next best friend to his daughter J.F.D., a minor and J.F.D., a minor
Defendant - Appellee:
CHARLOTTE MITCHEL, individually and as Guardian Ad Litem of J.F.D., appointed by the Court, WENDY KIRWAN, individually and as Supervisor Wake County N.C. Guardian Ad Litem Program, NAOMIE LIVINGSTON, Individually and as Director Wake County NC Guardian Ad Litem Program and all staff individually and in their official capacities as program managers, superiors and Advocate Attorneys for the Wake County NC 10th Judicial District Guardi and others
William Davis, Jr. v. Beverly Perdue
as 13-1568
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM SCOTT DAVIS, JR., as next friend to J.F.D., minor and J. F. D., a minor
Defendant - Appellee:
BEVERLY PERDUE, individually and in her official capacity as Governor of the State of North Carolina, WILLIAM C. HARRISON, individually and in his official capacity as Chairperson of the North Carolina State Board of Education, ROSA U. GILL, individually and in her official capacity as Chairperson of the North Carolina State Board of Education and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-1325
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Rippy-Bey et al v. North Carolina, State of et al
as 5:2013cv00040
Plaintiff:
Charles A. Rippy-Bey and The Noble Moors of the "Bey and "El" Tribes
Defendant:
North Carolina, State of, Roy Cooper, Michael F. Easley and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
William Scott Davis, Jr. v. Charlotte Mitchel
as 12-2552
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM SCOTT DAVIS, JR., as next best friend to his daughter J.F.D., a minor and J.F.D., a minor
Defendant - Appellee:
CHARLOTTE MITCHEL, individually and as Guardian Ad Litem of J.F.D., appointed by the Court, WENDY KIRWAN, individually and as Supervisor Wake County N.C. Guardian Ad Litem Program, NAOMIE LIVINGSTON, Individually and as Director Wake County NC Guardian Ad Litem Program and all staff individually and in their official capacities as program managers, superiors and Advocate Attorneys for the Wake County NC 10th Judicial District Guardi and others
Young v. State of North Carolina et al
as 5:2012ct03242
Plaintiff:
Robert E. Young
Defendant:
State of North Carolina and Beverly Perdue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cassell v. Parole or Probation Office et al
as 2:2012cv00964
Petitioner:
Charles M Cassell, III
Respondent:
Parole or Probation Office
Defendant:
Beverly Perdue
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
William Davis, Jr. v. Beverly Perdue
as 12-2238
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM SCOTT DAVIS, JR., as next friend to J.F.D., minor and J. F. D., a minor
Defendant - Appellee:
BEVERLY PERDUE, individually and in her official capacity as Governor of the State of North Carolina, WILLIAM C. HARRISON, individually and in his official capacity as Chairperson of the North Carolina State Board of Education, ROSA U. GILL, individually and in her official capacity as Chairperson of the North Carolina State Board of Education and others
William Davis, Jr. v. Charlotte Mitchel
as 12-2133
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM SCOTT DAVIS, JR., as next best friend to his daughter J.F.D., a minor and J.F.D., a minor
Defendant - Appellee:
CHARLOTTE MITCHEL, individually and as Guardian Ad Litem of J.F.D., appointed by the Court, WENDY KIRWAN, individually and as Supervisor Wake County N.C. Guardian Ad Litem Program, NAOMIE LIVINGSTON, Individually and as Director Wake County NC Guardian Ad Litem Program and all staff individually and in their official capacities as program managers, superiors and Advocate Attorneys for the Wake County NC 10th Judicial District Guardi and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
