Cases 11 - 20 of 28
BLAKEY v. WENEROWICZ
as 3:2013cv00575
Petitioner:
Michael Blakey
Respondent:
Michael Wenerowicz and Attorney General for the State of Pennsylvania
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BLAKEY v. WENEROWICZ
as 2:2013cv00996
Petitioner:
MICHAEL BLAKEY
Respondent:
MICHAEL WENEROWICZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ORR v. SHUST et al
as 2:2011cv00318
Plaintiff:
JOE ORR
Defendant:
JOHN SHUST, W. BROWN, S. BLAKEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv01593
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ORR v. SHUST et al
as 2:2010cv05616
Plaintiff:
JOEL ORR
Defendant:
JOHN SHUST, B. BROWN, A. BLAKEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jamaar Blakey v. Pittsburgh Pol Dept, et al
as 10-3532
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMAAR A. BLAKEY
Defendant - Appellee:
PITTSBURGH POL DEPT, ANTHONY VISCOMI, SGT., KEVIN WILSON, SGT. and others
Leslie Blakey v. Janice Snyder, et al
as 10-3172
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LESLIE C. BLAKEY
Defendant - Appellee:
JANICE SNYDER, DEBRA ADAMS, NANCY D. VERNON, (district attorney) and others
BLAKEY v. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2010cv00857
Petitioner:
LESLIE BLAKEY
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF FAYETTE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BLAKEY v. SNYDER et al
as 2:2010cv00750
Plaintiff:
LESLIE C. BLAKEY
Defendant:
JANICE SNYDER, DEBRA ADAMS, NANCY VERNON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jamaar Blakey v. Pittsburgh Pol Dept, et al
as 10-2183
Plaintiff - Pro Se Appellee:
JAMAAR A. BLAKEY
Defendant - Appellee:
PITTSBURGH POL DEPT, KEVIN WILSON and THOMAS STRANGRECKI
Defendant - Appellant:
ANTHONY VISCOMI
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
