Cases 41 - 50 of 78
BMO Harris Bank N.A. v. Lawson Environmental Service L.L.C. et al
as 4:2018cv01393
Defendant:
Cecil B. Lawson and Lawson Environmental Service L.L.C.
Plaintiff:
BMO Harris Bank N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BMO Harris Bank N.A. v. Mid-Ark Utilities & Rig Services, Inc. et al
as 4:2018cv04088
Plaintiff:
BMO Harris Bank N.A.
Defendant:
Mid-Ark Utilities & Rig Services, Inc., Mike Penney and Lonnie Graham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BMO Harris Bank, N.A. v. Perrin
as 4:2018cv00362
Plaintiff:
BMO Harris Bank, N.A.
Defendant:
Ray Allen Perrin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2018cv00643
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
BMO Harris Bank N.A. v. CST Logistics, Inc. et al
as 4:2017cv04112
Plaintiff:
BMO Harris Bank N.A.
Defendant:
CST Logistics, Inc. and Cody Tackett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BMO Harris Bank N.A. v. Canning Logistics Service LLC et al
as 8:2017cv00461
Plaintiff:
BMO Harris Bank N.A.
Defendant:
Canning Logistics Service LLC and Doran Post
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
BMO Harris Bank N.A. v. Unique Freight Systems, Inc. et al
as 4:2017cv04096
Plaintiff:
BMO Harris Bank N.A.
Defendant:
Unique Freight Systems, Inc. and Kenneth Dougan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
BMO Harris Bank N.A. v. Deason et al
as 0:2017cv04709
Plaintiff:
BMO Harris Bank N.A.
Defendant:
Cary Deason and Edward Deason
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BMO Harris Bank, N.A. v. Elvick Transport Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv00206
Plaintiff:
BMO Harris Bank, N.A.
Defendant:
Elvick Transport Inc. and Caden Elvick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BMO Harris Bank N.A. v. Flaming Eagle Express Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv03076
Plaintiff:
BMO Harris Bank N.A.
Defendant:
Flaming Eagle Express Inc. and William Carter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
