Cases 1 - 10 of 74
Solis v. Union Pacific Railroad Company et al
as 4:2023cv03434
Plaintiff:
Estela Solis
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company, BNSF Railway Company and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Wrongful Death
Lynn v. BNSF Railway Company
as 3:2023cv00216
Plaintiff:
Jason Lynn
Defendant:
BNSF Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Davis v. BNSF Railway Company et al
as 1:2023cv00008
Defendant:
BNSF Railway Company, The Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Company, Town of Sherman, Mississippi and others
Plaintiff:
Sherry Sheffield Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Howard v. Page et al
as 6:2022cv00821
Plaintiff:
Hayward Howard
Defendant:
Clint Page, BNSF Railway Company and B N S F Railway Co
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
James v. BNSF Railway Company
as 4:2021cv01272
Plaintiff:
Jerry B. James
Defendant:
BNSF Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Halterman v. National Railroad Passenger Corp et al
as 6:2021cv03776
Plaintiff:
David Halterman
Defendant:
National Railroad Passenger Corporation, BNSF Railway Company, Progressive Paloverde Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Roach v. BNSF Railway Company
as 4:2020cv01112
Defendant:
BNSF Railway Company and Burlington Northern and Santa Fe
Plaintiff:
Ronnie M. Roach
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Cater v. BNSF Railway Company
as 3:2020cv00042
Plaintiff:
Lloyd Cater
Defendant:
BNSF Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Smith v. BNSF Railway Company
as 1:2019cv00213
Plaintiff:
James David Smith
Defendant:
BNSF Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Cano v. BNSF Railway Company
as 2:2019cv00117
Plaintiff:
Joe Cano
Defendant:
BNSF Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
