Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Berryhill v. OK DOC Board Members, et al
as 14-6155
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LAVERN BERRYHILL
Defendant - Appellee:
OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS BOARD MEMBERS, DIRECTOR OF DENTISTRY, MARTY SIRMONS, Warden and others
Berryhill v. United States, et al
as 14-6140
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LAVERN BERRYHILL
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION and others
Dopp v. Jones, et al
as 14-6088
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD LYNN DOPP
Defendant - Appellee:
JUSTIN JONES, JOHNNY BLEVINS, RANDY KNIGHT and others
CLEMONS v. POST OFFICE et al
as 2:2014cv01558
Plaintiff:
CHAFARRAH CLEMONS
Defendant:
POST OFFICE, BOB COMPTON, ROSE TORRES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Muhammad v. Workman, et al
as 12-7080
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AB'DULLAH LAMAR RASHID MUHAMMAD
Defendant - Appellee:
RANDALL G. WORKMAN, Warden, TERRY CRENSHAW, Assistant Warden and BOB COMPTON, Food Service Supervisor
Berryhill v. Oklahoma Dept., et al
as 12-6210
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LAVERN BERRYHILL
Defendant - Appellee:
OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS BOARD MEMBERS, JUSTIN JONES, DIRECTOR OF DENTISTRY and others
Muhammad v. Workman, et al
as 12-7035
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AB'DULLAH LAMAR RASHID MUHAMMAD
Defendant - Appellee:
RANDALL G. WORKMAN, Warden, TERRY CRENSHAW, Assistant Warden and BOB COMPTON, Food Service Supervisor
Muhammad v. Brackensiek et al
as 6:2012cv00144
Plaintiff:
Abdullah L.R. Muhammad
Defendant:
Wayne Brackensiek, Terry Crenshaw and Bob Compton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Berryhill v. Oklahoma Department of Corrections Board Members et al
as 5:2012cv00279
Plaintiff:
Lavern Berryhill
Defendant:
Oklahoma Department of Corrections Board Members, Justin Jones, Director of Dentistry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Muhammad v. Workman et al
as 6:2012cv00094
Plaintiff:
Abdullah L.R. Muhammad
Defendant:
Randall Workman, Terry Crenshaw and Bob Compton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
