Cases 1 - 10 of 11
EVANS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv16232
Plaintiff:
BOBBY EVANS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
EVANS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv08095
Plaintiff:
BOBBY EVANS
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Evans v. Pfizer, Inc.
as 3:2018cv03218
Plaintiff:
Bobby Evans
Defendant:
Pfizer, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
EVANS v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2017cv12301
Plaintiff:
BOBBIE EVANS
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON , JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC and IMERYS TALC, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Evans et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv05335
Plaintiff:
Wanda Evans and Bobby Evans
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lindsey et al v. Combe Incorporated et al
as 3:2016cv00223
Plaintiff:
Kendrick Lindsey , Albert Jones , Brian Margulis and others
Defendant:
Combe Incorporated , Combe Products, Inc. , Combe Laboratories, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jessie Hill et al v. Pfizer Inc et al
as 2:2014cv02350
Plaintiff:
Jessie Hill , Cynthia Seaver , Debbie Els Wick and others
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc , McKesson Corporation and Does
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jessie Hill et al v. Pfizer Inc et al
as 2:2014cv01895
Defendant:
Does, McKesson Corporation and Pfizer Inc
Plaintiff:
Alicia Epps, Wyoma Estes, Bobbie Evans and others
Adams et al vs Pfizer, Inc.
as 3:2014cv00138
Plaintiff:
Delsie Adams, Mary Allen, Patricia Allen and others
Defendant:
Pfizer, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
EVANS v. WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORPORATION et al
as 2:2008cv81241
Plaintiff:
BOBBY EVANS
Defendant:
WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORPORATION, ABER INSULATION, GRAVES-ABER INSULATION COMPANY, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
