Cases 1 - 10 of 705
Owens et al v. Hill et al
as 1:2024cv01096
Plaintiff:
Roderick M Owens and Dwayne Jordan
Defendant:
Ricky Hill, FNU Watkins, f/n/u Gross and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rickey Benson v. Floyd Bonner, Jr., et al
as 24-5410
Plaintiff:
RICKEY BENSON
Defendant:
FLOYD BONNER, JR., Shelby County Sheriff, KIRK FIELDS, Chief Jailer, SHELBY COUNTY, TN GOVERNMENT, Employed as Mayor and others
Bonner v. Lammer
as 3:2024cv50145
Petitioner:
Lee Bonner
Respondent:
Brian Lammer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
JONES v. BONNER et al
as 2:2024cv00118
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY JONES
Defendant:
BONNER, REED, POPE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lee v. Bonner et al
as 2:2024cv02225
Plaintiff:
Wendolyn Lee
Defendant:
Floyd Bonner, Jr., Shelby County Commissioners, Kirk Field and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Eads v. Strada et al
as 1:2024cv01076
Plaintiff:
Mitchell Darnell Eads
Defendant:
Frank Strada, Chance Leeds, Kumetris Bonner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bonner v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv01129
Petitioner:
Ryan Rydell Bonner
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bonner v. Lumpkin
as 3:2024cv00090
Petitioner:
Ryan Rydell Bonner
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MARTIN v. MHM HEALTH PROFESSIONALS, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00092
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY MARTIN
Defendant:
MHM HEALTH PROFESSIONALS, LLC, CENTURION HEALTH OF INDIANA, LLC, CRISTINA REAGLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams et al v. Aramark et al
as 2:2024cv02146
Plaintiff:
Robert E. Williams, Corey D. Lurry and Jamal Moore
Defendant:
Aramark, Shelby County Sheriff Office, Floyd Bonner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
