Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 26-1834
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 26-1835
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Sentell v. Whitehorn et al
as 5:2026cv02632
Unknown:
J Briceno and JOHN DOE BOOKING SUPERVISOR
Plaintiff:
Laura Sentell
Defendant:
HENRY WHITEHORN, JOHN DOE CLASSIFICATION SUPERVISOR, JOHN DOE TRANSPORTATION SUPERVISOR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McKoby v. Smart Tri-Tech et al
as 2:2026cv02563
Plaintiff:
William Robey McKoby
Defendant:
Smart Tri-Tech, Elite Book Publisher, KCSC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
In Re: Howitz
as 26-1828
Petitioner:
DAN HOWITZ
Respondent:
HARVARD BOOK STORE, JEFFREY MAYERSOHN, MARNIE MURRAY and others
Grisham et al v. McGee et al
as 2:2026at01198
Plaintiff:
Arnold T. Grisham and William J. Miller
Defendant:
Marcus McGee, MeBookMeta and Pegasus Books, LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Book v. Social Security Administration
as 3:2026cv00204
Plaintiff:
Marisa Ann Book
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 Review of HHS Decision
Smith v. SWVRJA Duffield et al
as 7:2026cv00565
Plaintiff:
Arthur Allen Smith
Defendant:
SWVRJA Duffield, Booking Staff and Officers and Medical Staff and Officers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hachette Book Group, Inc. et al v. Google LLC
as 1:2026cv05869
Plaintiff:
Hachette Book Group, Inc., Cengage Learning, Inc., Elsevier Inc. and others
Defendant:
Google LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Egziabher v. Holloway et al
as 5:2026cv05172
Plaintiff:
Assefa Gabrel Egziabher, Jr.
Defendant:
Sheriff Holloway, Doe Benton County Detention Center Booking Staff and Doe Benton County Detention Center Transport Staff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
