Cases 31 - 40 of 137
AIGBEKAEN v. ORTIZ et al
as 1:2019cv22115
Respondent:
MS. RIVERA, AW SMITH, SOLICITOR GENERAL and others
Petitioner:
RAYMOND AIGBEKAEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv01093
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00228
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Credico v. Lyons et al
as 3:2019cv01097
Defendant:
Unknown John/Jane Doe FBI Agents, Unknown BOP I.T. Offc., S.I.S. Offc Lyons and others
Plaintiff:
Justin Credico
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rocmon Sanders v. Warden Sean Marler, et al
as 19-2153
Defendant / Appellee:
MEDICAL DEPT STAFF, F.D.C.- PHILA., CHARLES E. SAMUELS, JR., DIRECTOR, F.B.O.P., COMMISSARY DEPT STAFF, F.D.C. - PHILA. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROCMON L. SANDERS
SLOAN v. BOP
as 2:2019cv00227
Respondent:
BOP
Petitioner:
ALAN TODD SLOAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Dorsey v. United States of America et al
as 3:2019cv00113
Defendant:
Case Manager A. Foura-White, Nurse K. Williams, Counselor Mark Thompson and others
Plaintiff:
Robert S. Dorsey, II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Francisco Serrano v. Unknown BOP Employees
as 3:2018cv01866
Plaintiff:
Francisco Serrano
Defendant:
Unknown BOP employees and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
AKWEI v. BOP et al
as 3:2018cv00189
Defendant:
BOPP, GEO INC, MOSHANNON VALLEY CORRECTIONAL CENTER and others
Plaintiff:
THEOPHILUS AKWEI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
LEWIS v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2018cv13393
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, MARK S INCH and ACTING DIRECTOR OF BOP
Plaintiff:
KENNETH WAYNE LEWIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
