Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Lee v. The BOP - DSCC
as 5:2023cv05503
Plaintiff:
Mario Anton Lee
Defendant:
The BOP - DSCC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, Federal Filers (Bivens)
Roberts v. USA et al
as 1:2023cv03692
Plaintiff:
Timothy Munro Roberts
Defendant:
USA, BOP Director Collette Peters, Yankton FPC, Warden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, Federal Filers (Bivens)
Cobble v. US Government et al
as 6:2023cv00648
Plaintiff:
Daniel Cobble, Johnathan Wayne Plemons, Daniel Castleberry and others
Defendant:
US Government, US BOP, US BOP Director and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, Federal Filers (Bivens)
Chestnut v. Federal Bureau of Prisons (BOP)
as 1:2022cv02701
Petitioner:
Raymond Chestnut, Raymond Edward Chestnut and Ray Chestnut
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons (BOP)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Chestnut v. Federal Bureau of Prisons (BOP)
as 1:2022cv02420
Petitioner:
Raymond Edward Chestnut, Ray Chestnut and Raymond Chestnut
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons (BOP)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Coll v. Alamia et al
as 1:2021cv03712
Plaintiff:
Brian J. Coll
Defendant:
Hank Alamia, CO Thomas, CO Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. BOP Director, The et al
as 1:2019cv02118
Plaintiff:
William Jones and William Lee Jones
Defendant:
Beaumont USP, Pollock USP, McCreary USP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Heard v. BOP et al
as 9:2019cv01026
Defendant:
A. W. Jansan, U.S. Government, Warden Ramirez and others
Petitioner:
Antonio K Heard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
White v. Wilkes
as 0:2019cv00568
Respondent:
Custody of BOP Alston Wilkes
Petitioner:
Elijah Jerome White
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Jones v. BOP
as 1:2018cv03035
Respondent:
Warden
Plaintiff:
William Jones
Defendant:
BOP
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
