Cases 21 - 30 of 120
BANKS v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2022cv00538
Petitioner:
FREDERICK BANKS
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, BOP NATIONAL LOCKDOWN, MICHAEL CARJAVAL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
SMITH v. MOSER et al
as 3:2021cv00186
Plaintiff:
CHARLES PAUL SMITH
Defendant:
WARDEN V. MOSER, BOP DIRECTOR and BOP NER DIRECTOR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
SMITH v. MOSER et al
as 3:2021cv00187
Plaintiff:
CHARLES PAUL SMITH
Defendant:
WARDEN V. MOSER, BOP DIRECTOR and BOP NER DIRECTOR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
BLANDING v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 2:2021cv01115
Defendant:
UNKOWN BOP CORRECTION OFFICERS EMPLOYED BY THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, WARDEN SEAN MARLER, UNKNOWN BUEAU OF PRISONS MEDICAL STAFF and others
Plaintiff:
JAMAAL BLANDING
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
STRETCU v. FEDERAL BOP et al
as 3:2020cv00179
Defendant:
GEO/MVCC, DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and FEDERAL BOP
Plaintiff:
GHEORGHE STRETCU
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Andrews v BOP Medical Staff, et al
as 1:2020cv01083
In Re:
William Kiki Andrews
Defendant:
BOP Medical Staff, Scott Finley, Dr. Ellen Mace Leibson and others
Plaintiff:
William J. Andrews
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
AIGBEKAEN v. ORTIZ et al
as 1:2019cv22115
Respondent:
MS. RIVERA, AW SMITH, SOLICITOR GENERAL and others
Petitioner:
RAYMOND AIGBEKAEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Credico v. Lyons et al
as 3:2019cv01097
Defendant:
Unknown John/Jane Doe FBI Agents, Unknown BOP I.T. Offc., S.I.S. Offc Lyons and others
Plaintiff:
Justin Credico
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
SLOAN v. BOP
as 2:2019cv00227
Respondent:
BOP
Petitioner:
ALAN TODD SLOAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Dorsey v. United States of America et al
as 3:2019cv00113
Defendant:
Case Manager A. Foura-White, Nurse K. Williams, Counselor Mark Thompson and others
Plaintiff:
Robert S. Dorsey, II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
