Cases 1 - 10 of 32
ROGERS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv24648
Plaintiff:
BRAD ROGERS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Chuck's Hot Chicken Franchising, LLC v. Foods, LLC et al
as 4:2023cv00743
Plaintiff:
Chuck's Hot Chicken Franchising, LLC
Defendant:
Foods, LLC and Brad Rogers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Rogers v. ZA Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv22598
Defendant:
ZA Group, Inc, The Automotive Resource Network Holdings, Inc. and Does 1 through 25
Plaintiff:
Brad Rogers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wadlow v. Williams et al
as 2:2020cv02202
Defendant:
Jane Moskus, Brad Rogers, Michael Williams and others
Plaintiff:
Heather Wadlow
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rogers v. AZ Group, Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv00412
Plaintiff:
Brad Rogers
Defendant:
Does 1 through 25, ZA Group, Inc and The Automotive Resource Network Holdings, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jackson v. Jail ATM et al
as 3:2019cv01191
Defendant:
Jail ATM, Brad Rogers, Ballard and others
Plaintiff:
Keith D Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Moskus et al
as 2:2019cv02156
Defendant:
Jane Moskus, Michael Williams and Brad Rogers
Plaintiff:
Evette Robinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Steele v. Griffin et al
as 3:2018cv00630
Defendant:
John Perry, Brad Rogers, Kathy Griffin and others
Plaintiff:
Shaun L Steele
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shoemaker v. Rogers et al
as 3:2018cv00080
Plaintiff:
Billy Shoemaker
Defendant:
Sheriff Brad Rogers , Commander John Perry and Correct Care Solutions, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Tolliver v. Elkhart County Sheriff Dept et al
as 3:2017cv00609
Plaintiff:
Lonnie Tolliver
Defendant:
Brad Rogers, Capt Perry, Lt Edwards and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
