Cases 1 - 10 of 12
FOULKE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv00566
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
BRADLEY FOULKE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Phinisee v. Osborn, et al.
as 3:2019cv02152
Defendant:
Dale R Osborn, John Doe Correctional Officers, Ben Miller and others
Plaintiff:
Rischia Phinisee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
VEROSKO v. NOLAN et al
as 1:2010cv00025
Plaintiff:
DANIEL VEROSKO
Defendant:
MICHAEL NOLAN, DONALD DACUS, MATT BANACCI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
SCUTELLA v. CHAMBERLAIN et al
as 1:2009cv00082
Petitioner:
JHEN SCUTELLA
Respondent:
D. M. CHAMBERLAIN, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PA and BRADLEY FOULK
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
LASKARIS v. FOULK et al
as 1:2009cv00022
Petitioner:
ANDREW PETER LASKARIS
Respondent:
BRADLEY FOULK, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and D. S. CHAMBERLAIN
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Thomas Twillie v. Bradley Foulk, et al, et al
as 08-3316
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS LEE TWILLIE
Defendant - Appellee:
ERIE POL DEPT, STEPHEN E. FRANKLIN, THOMAS NELSON and others
KOEHLER v. BEARD et al
as 1:2008cv00156
Petitioner:
JOHN CHARLES KOEHLER
Respondent:
JEFFREY BEARD, ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and BRADLEY FOULK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
REED v. COURT OF COMMON PLEAS et al
as 1:2008cv00155
Plaintiff:
THOMAS L. REED, SR.
Defendant:
COURT OF COMMON PLEAS and BRADLEY FOULK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
FOWLER v. COUNTY OF ERIE et al
as 1:2008cv00045
Plaintiff:
JEREMY D. FOWLER
Defendant:
COUNTY OF ERIE, PRISON HEALTH SERVICES, INC., SUPERINTENDENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
In Re: Hudak
as 08-1029
Debtor - Appellant:
In the Matter of: JOSEPH E. HUDAK, Esq.
Defendant - Appellee:
BRADLEY FOULK
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
