Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Walter Edward Hayden et al v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2023cv01746
Defendant:
3M Company, The, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Walter Edward Hayden, John Lawrence Kemp, Gregory David Kaser and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Crowe v. United States of America et al
as 5:2022ct03320
Plaintiff:
Patrick Crowe
Defendant:
United States of America, Bureau of Prisons (BOP), Brandon Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Crowe v. United States of America et al
as 5:2022cv00335
Plaintiff:
Patrick Crowe
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Bureau of Prisons (BOP), Brandon Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Jones v. Frost et al
as 8:2022cv01319
Petitioner:
Brandon Jones
Respondent:
Brian Frost and Executive Director Kevin P. Guistwite
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 7:2020cv00370
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons and United States of America
Plaintiff:
Brandon Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jones v. Breen
as 0:2019cv00472
Defendant:
William Breen
Plaintiff:
Brandon Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Boyer v. Burreal et al
as 5:2018ct03252
Defendant:
Stephanie Hollemback, Amy Bullock, Unnamed Federal Bureau of Prisons employees and others
Plaintiff:
Joshua Keith Boyer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wagner v. Ramsey et al
as 5:2016ct03035
Plaintiff:
James L. Wagner
Defendant:
Roscoe Ramsey, Brandon Jones, C. Bunn and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jones v. Cartledge
as 2:2015cv02439
Petitioner:
Brandon Jones
Respondent:
Larry Cartledge
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jones v. American Credit Acceptance Corporation et al
as 4:2014cv04130
Plaintiff:
Brandon Jones
Defendant:
American Credit Acceptance Corporation and Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
