Cases 1 - 9 of 9
CHILDRESS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv16192
Plaintiff:
BRIAN CHILDRESS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
CHILDRESS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv01967
Plaintiff:
BRIAN CHILDRESS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Taylor v. Smith & Nephew Inc et al
as 1:2021cv00757
Defendant:
Robert K Leedy LLC, Brian Childress, Richard Mills Roberts and others
Plaintiff:
Mary E Taylor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Taylor v. Smith & Nephew Inc et al
as 3:2021cv00531
Defendant:
Brian Childress, Smith & Nephew, Robert K. Leedy, LLC and others
Special Master:
Special Master
Plaintiff:
Mary E. Taylor and Mary E Taylor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PINKNEY v. BENDER et al
as 7:2017cv00047
Plaintiff:
ELLIOTT PINKNEY, JR
Defendant:
VERNITA LEE BENDER, BRIAN CHILDRESS, JOHN KENT EDWARDS, JR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Centennial Elevator Industries, Inc. v. Centennial Elevators Ind., Corp. et al
as 1:2016cv04580
Defendant:
Centennial Elevat0r Industries, Inc., Centennial Elevators Ind., Corp., Brian Childress and others
Plaintiff:
Centennial Elevator Industries, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
ELLIS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 7:2016cv00121
Plaintiff:
RECKO M ELLIS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, NANCY PELOSI, JAMES COMEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kirby et al v. Smith & Nephew Inc et al
as 3:2015cv02543
Plaintiff:
Bonnie Kirby and Adrian Kirby
Defendant:
Smith & Nephew Inc , Smith & Nephew Inc, Orthopaedic Division , Smith & Nephew Inc, Orthopaedic Reconstruction and Traumatic Divisions and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hutchens et al v. Smith & Nephew Inc
as 3:2013cv04979
Plaintiff:
Timothy Hutchens and Karen Hutchens
Defendant:
Smith & Nephew Inc and Brian Childress
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
