Cases 1 - 10 of 32
Holm et al v. Federal Bureau of Investigation et al
as 3:2023cv05177
Plaintiff:
Brian Holm and Kristin Holm
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Investigation and United States Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
HOLMES v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv15853
Plaintiff:
BRIAN HOLMES
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
(PC) Rodriguez v. Tsui et al
as 2:2022cv01101
Plaintiff:
Maximiliano Rodriguez
Defendant:
David Tsui, James Brown, Brian Holmes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LURCH v. BERNAL et al
as 2:2022cv01506
Plaintiff:
ROBERT DEREK LURCH, JR.
Defendant:
POLICE OFFICER DANIEL BERNAL, POLICE OFFICER BRIAN HOLMES and DOCTOR THAT ORDERED THE SEDATIVES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Rodriguez v. Tsui et al
as 2:2021cv02208
Plaintiff:
Maximiliano Rodriguez
Defendant:
David Tsui, James Brown and Brian Holmes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Blackwell v. Tsui et al
as 2:2021cv02207
Plaintiff:
Bradley Blackwell
Defendant:
David Tsui, James Brown, Brian Holmes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv10983
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
HOLMES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv70172
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
BRIAN HOLMES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HOLM v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv04468
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
BRIAN HOLM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HOLMES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv75234
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
BRIAN HOLMES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
