Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Broderick v. AutoAssure, LLC
as 4:2023cv00529
Plaintiff:
Timothy Broderick and Timothy J. Broderick
Defendant:
AutoAssure LLC and AutoAssure, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Flowers v. Norman
as 4:2019cv00134
Respondent:
Jeff Norman
Petitioner:
Broderick Deron Flowers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Reising et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 4:2018cv00380
Plaintiff:
Amanda Reising , Ivette Babuca , Gloria Barotta and others
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson , Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc. , Imerys Talc America, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv04159
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Simmons et al v. Skechers USA, Inc. et al
as 4:2015cv00341
Plaintiff:
Dorothy Simmons , Debbie Barger , Jacqueline Betts and others
Defendant:
Skechers USA. Inc. , Skechers U.S.A., Inc. II and Skechers Fitness Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Agnew et al v. Fresenius Medical Care North America, Inc. et al
as 4:2013cv02468
Plaintiff:
John Agnew , David Boyle , Peter Alzugary and others
Defendant:
Fresenius Medical Care North America, Inc., Fresenius USA, Inc. , Fresenius Medical Care Holdings, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hawkins v. Norman
as 4:2013cv01468
Petitioner:
Broderick K. Hawkins
Respondent:
Jeff Norman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2013cv01441
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2013cv01246
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Flowers v. Powers et al
as 5:2012cv06011
Plaintiff:
Broderick Deron Flowers
Defendant:
Powers, Montgomery, Lima and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
