Cases 1 - 10 of 96
Butler v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv01060
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Wayne Butler, Jr
Defendant:
Bryan Scott Lee, Brian Davenport, City of Cleburne Texas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Barber v. Katy Independent School District et al
as 4:2024cv01004
Plaintiff:
Staci Barber
Defendant:
Katy Independent School District and Bryan Scott Rounds
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cavett v. Collier
as 6:2024cv00075
Petitioner:
Bryan Scott Cavett
Respondent:
Bryan Collier
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Cavett v. Lumpkin et al
as 6:2023cv00559
Plaintiff:
Bryan Scott Cavett
Defendant:
Bobby Lumpkin, Warden Juan Garcia, C Eppeland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ABREGO et al v 3M COMPANY
as 9:2023cv08190
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH ABREGO, ANTONIO AGUILAR, JOSE R AGUILERA and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
RATEL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv03484
Plaintiff:
BRYAN SCOTT RATEL
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Abrego et al v. 3M Company
as MN/0:23-CV-02818
Plaintiff:
Joseph Abrego, Antonio Aguilar, Jose R Aguilera and others
Defendant:
3M Company
Abrego et al v. 3M Company
as 0:2023cv02818
Plaintiff:
Joseph Abrego, Antonio Aguilar, Jose R Aguilera and others
Defendant:
3M Company
COMPTON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv18804
Plaintiff:
BRYAN SCOTT COMPTON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Bryan Sparks v. Thomas Teodosio, et al
as 23-3545
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRYAN SCOTT SPARKS
Defendant / Appellee:
THOMAS A. TEODOSIO, SHERRI BEVAN WALSH, SUSAN BAKER ROSS and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
