Cases 61 - 70 of 145
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2017cv01857
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Garten v. Federal Bureau Of Prisons
as 7:2017cv01584
Petitioner:
Kathryn G Garten
Respondent:
Federal Bureau Of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Vanessa Cooper v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 7:2017cv01580
Plaintiff:
Vanessa R Cooper
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, A. Wachington-Adduci, Richard Griffen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miranda-Lizardi v. Federal Bureau of Prisons (INMATE 3)
as 2:2017cv00279
Plaintiff:
Anthony Miranda-Lizardi
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Milton v. Federal Bureau of Prisons (INMATE 3)
as 2:2017cv00278
Plaintiff:
Gregory Milton
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rodriguez v. Federal Bureau of Prisons (INMATE 3)
as 2:2017cv00277
Plaintiff:
Javier Rodriguez
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mason v. Federal Bureau of Prisons (INMATE 3)
as 2:2017cv00280
Plaintiff:
Aundra Mason
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dorta-Hernandez v. Federal Bureau of Prisons (INMATE 3)
as 2:2017cv00281
Plaintiff:
Saul Dorta-Hernandez
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Delgado v. United States of America, The et al
as 2:2017cv00300
Petitioner:
Maria Aide Delgado
Respondent:
United States of America, The, United States Attorney General, Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 1
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ghanem v. U.S. Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Prisons et al (JOINT ASSIGN)(MAG2)
as 2:2016mc03768
Plaintiff:
Darlene Diak Ghanem
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Prisons and Michael Ghanem
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
