Cases 1 - 10 of 34
Kim v. BMT of Kentucky, Inc. et al
as 5:2023cv00048
Plaintiff:
Hai Jung Emily Kim
Defendant:
BMT of Kentucky, Inc. doing business as Burger King # 19690 and Continental Western Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Hill v. State Farm et al
as 1:2022cv00032
Plaintiff:
Anthony B. Hill
Defendant:
State Farm, TDCI, AT&T and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00098
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Spurlock v. Carrols LLC
as 1:2020cv01038
Plaintiff:
Angela Spurlock
Defendant:
Carrols LLC and Carrols LLC doing business as Burger King Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Morso BK, LLC v. Burger King Corporation
as 2:2020cv05838
Defendant:
Burger King Corporation
Plaintiff:
Morso BK, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Thompkins v. Nashville Quality, LLC d/b/a Burger King
as 2:2020cv02677
Plaintiff:
Harvie A Thompkins
Defendant:
Nashville Quality, LLC doing business as Burger King
Not Classified By Court:
Temiika Gipson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lewis v. Burger King Corporation
as 0:2020cv00098
Plaintiff:
Allen Lewis
Defendant:
Burger King Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Ingram v. Burger King #11281 et al
as 5:2018cv00069
Plaintiff:
Tamara Ingram
Defendant:
Burger King 11281 , Drury Restaurants, Inc and MidAmerica Hotels Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Freeman v. Commonwealth of Kentucky et al
as 3:2017cv00422
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Freeman
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Kentucky, City of Louisville, Kroger Stores and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-5346
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
