Cases 31 - 40 of 40
Fox et al v. Aqua-Chem, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv00016
Plaintiff:
Stanley Earl Fox and Patricia Bush Fox
Defendant:
Aqua-Chem, Inc., Borg-Warner Morse TEC, Inc., CertainTeed Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
TISDELL v. BULLOCK et al
as 1:2008cv00603
Plaintiff:
FRED MELVIN TISDELL
Defendant:
TERRY BULLOCK, CATHY WEBB, T.E. CRAIG and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
McClelland v. Harris et al
as 5:2007cv00113
Plaintiff:
James Franklin McClelland
Defendant:
Joseph Harris and Mikeal Bush
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
OLIVER v. CIOLLI et al
as 1:2007cv00740
Plaintiff:
JAMES OLIVER
Defendant:
DENNIS CIOLLI and GEORGE W. BUSH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
OLIVER v. U.S. GOVERNMENT et al
as 1:2007cv00671
Plaintiff:
JAMES OLIVER
Defendant:
U.S. GOVERNMENT, GEORGE BUSH, DENNIS CIOLLI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2007cv00091
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2007cv00336
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Wood v. Mecklenburg County Department of Social Services et al
as 3:2007cv00273
Plaintiff:
William Wood
Defendant:
Mecklenburg County Department of Social Services, Richard Jacobsen and Sonia Bush
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Becker v. Hudson et al
as 5:2007hc02109
Petitioner:
Jan F. Becker
Respondent:
Stewart Hudson, Virginia Lameneck, G.W. Bush and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Anderson v. Monette et al
as 5:2007ct03036
Plaintiff:
Joseph G. Anderson
Defendant:
LaShonda, Dr. Bush and Jerry G. Monette
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
