Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00461
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
DEC v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2022cv01290
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW P. DEC and Matthew Paul Dec, I
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, PENN DOT, PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv01063
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Matthew Parker v. Butler County, et al
as 20-1970
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MATTHEW S. PARKER
Defendant / Appellee:
WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES INC, GLORIA SCHWEITZER, Quality Mental Health Professional and BUTLER COUNTY, Pennsylvania
Defendant:
COUNTY OF BUTLER, Pennsylvania
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv01310
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
PARKER v. WEXFORD HEALTH SERVICES, INC. et al
as 2:2018cv00911
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW S. PARKER
Defendant:
BUTLER COUNTY PENNSYLVANIA, GLORIA SCHWEITZER and WEXFORD HEALTH SERVICES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 16-3194
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
EVANS v. OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES PENSION PLAN OF THE CITY OF BUTLER, BUTLER COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2016cv00273
Plaintiff:
SUSAN E. EVANS
Defendant:
OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES PENSION PLAN OF THE CITY OF BUTLER, BUTLER COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA and CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BUTLER, PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00955
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00339
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Health Care Qualty Improvement Act of 1986
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
