Cases 1 - 10 of 100
DOMINY v. EVANS et al
as 2:2026cv00308
Plaintiff:
BRIAN MICHAEL DOMINY
Defendant:
MARK DISALESANDRO, STEPHEN BUZAS and R. EVANS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
J. M. et al v. Los Angeles Unified School District et al
as 2:2026cv01690
Plaintiff:
Tahona Cooper and J.M.
Defendant:
Los Angeles Unified School District, Jennifer Sullivan, Denise Collier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
JOHNSON v. JOHNSON et al
as 2:2025cv00683
Defendant:
THEODORE JOHNSON, TERMINE, Termite and others
Plaintiff:
ANTON JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
WILLIS v. BUZAS et al
as 2:2025cv00612
Plaintiff:
RAHEEM WILLIS
Defendant:
STEPHEN BUZAS, DR. CHANG, A. MILLER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Isaac Naranjo v. George Little, et al
as 25-1733
Plaintiff:
ISAAC NARANJO
Defendant:
GEORGE M. LITTLE, TABB BICKELL, STEPHEN BUZAS and others
RICHARDSON v. PUSHEY et al
as 2:2025cv00448
Plaintiff:
ANTWAN L. RICHARDSON
Defendant:
C.O. PUSHEY, C.O. HINEBAUGH, C.O. DIVENS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
DRUMMOND v. EVANS et al
as 2:2025cv00313
Plaintiff:
RASHEEM JAMES DRUMMOND
Defendant:
RANDY EVANS, SGT KOPLIC, BURC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
HAMMOND v. THOMAS et al
as 2:2024cv01535
Defendant:
CORRECTIONS OFFICER THOMAS, CORRECTIONS OFFICER PHILLIPS, SUPERINTENDENT MICHAEL ZAKEN and others
Plaintiff:
KHALIL HAMMOND
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
ROSARIO v. ZAKEN et al
as 2:2024cv01387
Defendant:
COUNSELOR ERIC HURD, SERGEANT WRIGHT, LIEUTENANT YAUGER and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID ROSARIO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Buzas v. Lyft, Inc. et al
as 4:2024cv00265
Plaintiff:
Andrea Buzas
Defendant:
Patrick Jaywheh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Tort/Motor Vehicle (
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
