Cases 31 - 39 of 39
Mohammed v. Ruzewsk et al
as 1:2010cv08092
Plaintiff:
Bah Mohammed
Defendant:
D. Ruzewsk and Two other Officer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carmichael v. Officer Bah
as 8:2009cv03444
Plaintiff:
Donnell Carmichael
Defendant:
Officer Bah
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bah et al v. United States Department of Homeland Security and Immigration and Customs Enforcement Office of Detention and Removal Operations et al
as 1:2009cv03498
Petitioner:
Mohammed Bah, Hugue Louismare, Abdou Elsaghir and others
Respondent:
United States Department of Homeland Security and Immigration and Customs Enforcement Office of Detention and Removal Operations and Varick Varick Federal Detention Center 201 Varick Street, New York, 10014
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Bah v. U.S. Homeland Security
as 1:2009cv01504
Petitioner:
Mohamed Bah
Respondent:
U.S Homeland Security, Bureau of Immigration and Customs Enforcement
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Abdulaziz Bah v. United States
as 09-1204
Petitioner - Appellant:
Abdulaziz Bah
Respondent - Appellee:
United States of America
Bustillo v. Beeler et al
as 5:2008ct03097
Plaintiff:
Fernando Bustillo
Defendant:
Art Beeler, Anthony Scarantino, SKS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bah v. United States of America
as 1:2008cv00087
Petitioner:
Abdulaziz Bah
Respondent:
United States of America and United States of America
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Sadou Bah v. Mark Cangemi, etc., et al
as 08-1705
Petitioner - Appellant:
Sadou Alious Bah
Respondent - Appellee:
Mark Cangemi, District Director, United States Immigration & Customs Enforcement (ICE), Michael Chertoff, Secretary, Department of Homeland Security, Michael B. Mukasey, Attorney General and others
Bah v. Chertoff et al
as 2:2008cv00079
Petitioner:
Ibrahima Bah
Respondent:
Michael Chertoff, Peter D. Keisler and David O. Streiff
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
