Cases 11 - 20 of 1,742
Hunt v. State of Maryland et al
as 1:2024cv00888
Petitioner:
Kareem Eugene Hunt
Defendant:
State of Maryland and Warden William Bailey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Adam Hall v. DAC Prison
as 24-6261
Plaintiff:
ADAM WADE HALL, a/k/a Abdul Al Kareem Muhammad
Defendant:
DAC PRISON and RAYMOND BAILEY, Tabor CI Program Director
DePaola v. Scruggs et al
as 1:2024cv00733
Plaintiff:
Eric DePaola
Defendant:
Carolyn J. Scruggs, Annie D. Harvey, F. Todd Taylor, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Sorrick v. West et al
as 1:2024cv00744
Plaintiff:
Kevin Sorrick
Defendant:
Warden, Warden Walter West, Warden Deborah Darden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
US v. James Bailey, Jr.
as 24-6191
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
JAMES W. BAILEY, JR., a/k/a James W. "Bill" Bailey, Jr.
Howe v. Scruggs et al
as 1:2024cv00653
Plaintiff:
Stephen J. Howe
Defendant:
Carolyn Scruggs, Annie D. Harvey, J. Philip Morgan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Golden v. Bailey
as 1:2024cv00656
Petitioner:
Randy D. Golden
Respondent:
William Bailey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Oglesby v. Bailey et al
as 1:2024cv00504
Petitioner:
Howard Keith Oglesby
Respondent:
William Bailey, State of Maryland and Attorney General of the State of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Marqueion Harrison v. Warden Bullard
as 24-6128
Plaintiff:
MARQUEION HARRISON
Defendant:
WARDEN BULLARD, STEPHEN JACOBS, SERGEANT LEGGETT and others
R. C. et al v. Cabell County Board of Education et al
as 3:2024cv00057
Plaintiff:
R. C. and S. C.
Defendant:
The Cabell County Board of Education, Pamela Bailey, Janessa Freeman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
