Cases 1 - 10 of 100
BAKSH v. FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION
as 2:2026cv06817
Plaintiff:
ASIF BAKSH
Defendant:
FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Baksh v. Homeland Protective Services, Inc. et al
as 4:2026cv06922
Plaintiff:
Adil Baksh
Defendant:
Homeland Protective Services, Inc. and Mohammed H Lodhi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv03102
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 nr Notice of Removal
Baksh v. NCL (Bahamas) Ltd.
as 1:2026cv21103
Plaintiff:
Kareema Baksh
Defendant:
NCL (Bahamas) Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Baksh v. Loreal USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2025cv01856
Plaintiff:
Nazima Baksh
Defendant:
Loreal USA, Inc., Loreal USA Products, Inc., SoftSheen-Carson LLC, and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
United States of America v. Mohammad Saleh
as 25-392
Defendant:
MULLAH BAKSH GHULAM MOHAMMAD SALEH and Sealed Defendant 1
:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
BAKSH v. AIMBRIDGE HOSPITALITY LLC et al
as 3:2024cv00248
Defendant:
AIMBRIDGE HOSPITALITY, LLC and RB FORT WALTON LLC
Plaintiff:
Shafeek Baksh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Hank et al v. AMERICAN SECURITY INSURANCE COMPANY
as 0:2024cv60868
Defendant:
AMERICAN SECURITY INSURANCE COMPANY
Plaintiff:
Omar Hank and Maranda Baksh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Wah v. Vargas et al
as 1:2024cv03146
Plaintiff:
John Joseph Hop Wah
Defendant:
Javier E. Vargas, Antonolla Papaloo, Nicole Wint-Baksh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Baksh v. Livingston County Community Mental Health et al
as 2:2024cv10995
Plaintiff:
Christian Baksh
Defendant:
Livingston County Community Mental Health, Connie Conklin, John Does 1-x and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
