Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Mehta, et al. v. Blanche
as 26-3171
Petitioner:
ANIL KUMAR MEHTA, RAJNI BALA, MUNEET MEHTA and others
Respondent:
TODD BLANCHE, ACTING ATTORNEY GENERAL
Xiamen Tingken Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. v. Bala Bangles, Inc.
as 1:2026cv02481
Plaintiff:
Xiamen Tingken Electronic Technology Co., Ltd.
Defendant:
Bala Bangles, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv01335
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (v)(p) - Violation of Due Process & Equal Protection
Anderson v. South Lyon Hotel, Inc et al
as 2:2026cv10987
Plaintiff:
Christian Anderson
Defendant:
South Lyon Hotel, Inc and Corry Bala
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Tessell, Inc. et al v. Nutanix, Inc. et al
as 3:2026cv02306
Plaintiff:
Tessell, Inc., Bala Kuchibhotla, Kamaldeep Khanuja and others
Defendant:
Nutanix, Inc., Rajiv Ramaswami and Tyler Wall
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2026cv00230
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2026cv00310
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
ShinStar LLC v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2025cv13107
Plaintiff:
ShinStar LLC
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, e-supao, EUXOEUOXGC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
United States of America v. Nunez (Hernandez)
as 25-2643
Defendant:
JERRIN PENA, ARIEL OLIVER, JUSTIN DEAZA and others
Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
