Cases 1 - 10 of 123
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01477
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
BALL v. DURANT et al
as 1:2024cv01387
Defendant:
MOORE, DAVE DURANT and JAIL COMMANDER
Plaintiff:
OMER DEAN BALL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Indiana Department of Correction et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 3:2024cv00600
Defendant:
Tiffany Lewis, Jonathan Hill, Richard Arnold and others
Plaintiff:
Audrain Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00884
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
BALL v. CENTURION HEALTH OF INDIANA LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00095
Plaintiff:
KEITH ALLEN BALL
Defendant:
CENTURION HEALTH OF INDIANA LLC, BARBARA RIGGS and JANE OR JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00345
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
MCGINNIS v. MANNING et al
as 1:2023cv02242
Plaintiff:
ZACHARY J. MCGINNIS
Defendant:
MANNING, MCCAFFERTY, BALL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00504
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
BENNETT v. BALL et al
as 2:2023cv00457
Plaintiff:
KEVIN BENNETT
Defendant:
SAMANTHA BALL, DYLAN RUMER, MICHAEL HICKS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01323
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.