Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Eric Rich v. Daniel Hersl
as 23-6775
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ERIC DEANDRE RICH
Defendant / Appellee:
OFFICER DANIEL HERSL, Individually and as a police officer for Baltimore City Police Dept.
Bowles v. Hersl et al
as 1:2022cv01992
Plaintiff:
Jamar Bowles
Defendant:
Officer DANIEL HERSL, John E. Burns, Jr., Stephen Romey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Holden v. Giordano et al
as 1:2022cv01994
Plaintiff:
Alex Holden
Defendant:
Jason Giordano, Jimmy Shetterly, Baltimore City Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Spencer v. Baltimore City Police Dept. et al
as 1:2020cv03008
Defendant:
State of Maryland and Baltimore City Police Dept.
Plaintiff:
Carl Spencer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Pauling v. Hendrix et al
as 1:2020cv02211
Defendant:
Wayne Jenkins, Dean Palmere, Evodio Hendrix and others
Plaintiff:
Donte Pauling
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Warden of B.C.B.I.C et al
as 1:2020cv01189
Respondent:
Christiana Reynolds, Robert Cucchiaro, Baltimore City Police Dept. Central Division and others
Petitioner:
Ray M. Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Thomas v. Rayam et al
as 1:2020cv00541
Defendant:
Dean Palmere, John Clewell, Thomas Allers and others
Plaintiff:
Sherman Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tate v. Hersl et al
as 1:2019cv02240
Defendant:
Dep. Police Comm. Dean Palmere, Major Ian Dombrowski, Officer Kevin Fassl and others
Plaintiff:
Herbert Tate
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hamilton v. Hersl et al
as 1:2019cv01981
Defendant:
Wayne Jenkins, Daniel Hersl, Momodu Gondo and others
Plaintiff:
Nancy Hamilton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Baltimore City Police Dept. et al
as 1:2019cv01332
Defendant:
Detective Mark L. Tomlin, Detective Michael Crutchfield, Judge Kathleen Friedman and others
Plaintiff:
Dewayne Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
