Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Rodriguez v. Bank of America, N.A.
as 3:2019cv01236
Defendant:
Bank of America, N.A.
Plaintiff:
Gloria Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Bank of America, N.A. v. Lake Las Vegas Master Association et al
as 2:2017cv02100
Plaintiff:
Bank of America, N.A.
Defendant:
Alan Chambers and Lake Las Vegas Master Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Madore v. Army and Air Force Exchange Service et al
as 3:2016cv02310
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Madore
Defendant:
Army and Air Force Exchange Service , Bank of America, N.A. , Monterey Financial Services, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Phillips et al v. Randall S. Miller & Associates, P.C. et al
as 4:2015cv14082
Plaintiff:
Keith Phillips and Paula Phllips
Defendant:
Randall S. Miller & Associates, P.C., Marla A. Skeltis, Robert J. Curtis and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Bank of America Corporation et al
as 5:2012mc80263
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
Bank of America Corporation, Residential Capitol, LLC, Ally Financial, Inc., and others
Movant:
Imant Kotsinsh
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Julio Tapia v. U.S. Bank, N.A.
as 10-1856
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JULIO TAPIA and EDITH TAPIA
Defendant - Appellee:
U.S. BANK, N.A., as trustee for RFMSI 2006S3, RFMSI SERIES 2006-S3 TRUST, HOMECOMINGS FINANCIAL LLC and others
Defendant:
FIRST SAVINGS MORTGAGE CORPORATION and LARRY F. PRATT
Tapia et al v. U.S. Bank, N.A. et al
as 1:2009cv01025
Plaintiff:
Julio E. Tapia and Edith M. Tapia
Defendant:
U.S. Bank, N.A., RFMSI Series 2006-S3 Trust, Homecomings Financial LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Fair Debt Collection Act
Peacock v. Bank of America, N.A., et al
as 2:2008cv00849
Defendant:
Bank of America, N.A., Bank of America, N.A., John Does and others
Plaintiff:
Diana Peacock, Diana Peacock and Diana Peacock
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
