Cases 1 - 10 of 499
U S Bank Trust Company National Association v. Gatson
as 3:2024cv00414
Plaintiff:
U.S. Bank Trust Company, National Association, as trustee, as successor-in-interest to U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee, Successor in Interest to Bank of America, National Association and U S Bank Trust Company National Association
Defendant:
Helen Gatson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgment
UNITED STATES v. 0.1785 acres of land, more or less, situate in Chesapeake, Virginia et al
as 2:2024cv00023
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES
Defendant:
MSF Investors II, LLC, Arcadia Equity Associates, City Of Chesapeake and others
Perrotta et al v. Bank of America National Association
as 1:2024cv00021
Plaintiff:
Bryan Perrotta and Nicole Perrotta
Defendant:
Bank of America National Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Foreclosure
National Railroad Passenger Corporation (AMTRAK) v. .025 Acres More or Less of Land located at 1006 North Payson Street in Baltimore City, Maryland et al
as 1:2023cv02158
Defendant:
Yvette Wormley, The Estate of Lula Thrower, Testate and Intestate Successors of Lula Thrower and others
Plaintiff:
National Railroad Passenger Corporation (AMTRAK)
Cause Of Action: 43 U.S.C. § 421 Complaint in Condemnation - Eminent Domain
U.S. Bank Trust Company, National Association, as Trustee, as Successor-in-Interest to U.S. Bank National Association, as Successor in Interest to Bank of America National Association, successor by me v. Sanchez, Jr. et al
as 5:2023cv00974
Plaintiff:
U.S. Bank Trust Company, National Association, as Trustee, as Successor-in-Interest to U.S. Bank National Association, as Successor in Interest to Bank of America National Association, successor by me
Defendant:
Johnny Sanchez, Jr. and Betty Jo Sanchez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
U.S. Bank National Association et al v. Fowler et al
as 4:2023cv02634
Plaintiff:
U.S. Bank National Association, as successor in interest to Bank of America National Association, successor by merger to LaSalle Bank National Association, as Trustee for GSAMP Trust 2006-HE7, Mortgag and U.S. Bank National Association
Defendant:
Virtle Fowler and Muriel Dwight Fowler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgment
Fligor et al v. Select Portfolio Servicing et al
as 1:2023cv11551
Plaintiff:
Andrew T. Fligor and Leslye P. Fligor
Defendant:
Select Portfolio Servicing, U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee Successor Interest to Bank of America, National Association, as Trustee as Successor by Merger to Lasalle Bank, National Association as Trustee for WAMU Mortgage Pass-Through Certificate and U.S. Bank National Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Alanis v. U.S. Bank National Association
as 5:2023cv00749
Plaintiff:
Nancy Alanis
Defendant:
U.S. Bank National Association, as Successor Trustee to Bank of America, National Association, as Successor by Merger to LaSalle Bank, N.A., as Trustee for the MLMI Trust Series 2006-HE6 and Nationstar Mortgage LLC doing business as Mr. Cooper
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Foreclosure
Gokhvat Holdings LLC v. U.S. Bank National Association
as 23-300
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Gokhvat Holdings LLC
Defendant / Appellee:
U.S. Bank National Association, Successor Trustee to Bank of America, National Association As Succesor By Merger to LaSalle Bank NA As Trustee For Washington Mutual Mortgage PassThrough Certificates Wamu Series 2007OA4 Trust and Bank of America National Association, As Successor By Merger To LaSalle Bank NA As Trustee For Washington Mutual Mortgage PassThrough Certificates WAMU Series 2007 OA4 Trust
Young v. Bank of America, National Association
as 2:2023cv02094
Plaintiff:
Michael Young
Defendant:
Bank of America, National Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Petition to Quiet Ti
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
