Cases 1 - 10 of 270
Perkins v. PNC Bank
as 3:2024cv00234
Plaintiff:
Gavin Perkins
Defendant:
PNC Bank
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Banks v. Stokes et al.
as 3:2024cv00252
Plaintiff:
Charles E. Banks, III, Chuck Banks and Chuckie Banks
Defendant:
Michael T. Stokes, C. Holycross, D. Deangelo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Banks, III v. Bianchims et al.
as 3:2024cv00250
Plaintiff:
Charles E. Banks, III
Defendant:
Melody Bianchims, C. Holycross, D. Deangelo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stradford v. U.S. Bank
as 1:2023cv02135
Plaintiff:
LeShawn Stradford
Defendant:
U.S. Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Hoskins v. Dutcher et al
as 6:2023cv00167
Plaintiff:
Kennie Hoskins
Defendant:
Robert Dutcher, Matthew Halcomb, Erica Brock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hogan v. Smith
as 3:2023cv00226
Plaintiff:
Tremain Hogan
Defendant:
Annette Chambers Smith, Warden Ed Banks, Micheal Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Spicer-Banks v. Frazee
as 3:2023cv00215
Plaintiff:
Brandon Spicer-Banks
Defendant:
Anna Frazee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Phillips v. Johnson and Johnson et al
as 1:2023cv01152
Plaintiff:
Gerald K. Phillips and Jerry K. Phillips
Defendant:
Johnson and Johnson, Secretary Department of Health and Human Services, Cuyahoga County City Government and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Banks v. King
as 4:2023cv10947
Petitioner:
Antonio Banks
Respondent:
Warden Chris King and Chris King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Banks v. City of East Cleveland et al
as 1:2023cv00838
Plaintiff:
Robert Banks, Jr.
Defendant:
City of East Cleveland and Officer Andrew Majercik
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
