Cases 21 - 30 of 46
Powell v. Walls et al
as 4:2013cv00242
Plaintiff:
Billy Jack Powell
Defendant:
Scott Walls and Dewayne Bankson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bridgewater et al v. Holder et al
as 2:2012cv15423
Plaintiff:
Sharon Bridgewater, Specialty Global Investments, Inc and Bridgewater & Company Inc.
Defendant:
Eric Holder, Jr., John Doe, Lanny Breuer and others
Bridgewater et al v. Obama et al
as 2:2012cv14916
Plaintiff:
Sharon Bridgewater, Specialty Investment Group, LLC and Bridgewater & Company Inc.
Defendant:
Barak H. Obama, Eric Holder, Jr., John Doe and others
Bridgewater et al v. Obama et al
as 2:2012cv14709
Plaintiff:
Sharon Bridgewater, Bridgewater & Company Inc. and Specialty Investment Group, LLC
Defendant:
Barak H. Obama, Eric Holder, Jr., John Doe and others
Bridgewater v. Obama et al
as 5:2012cv14469
Plaintiff:
Sharon Bridgewater
Defendant:
Barak H. Obama, Eric Holder, Jr., Saundra Brown Armstrong and others
Smith v. Walls et al
as 4:2012cv03498
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Smith
Defendant:
Scott Walls and Dewayne Bankson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bridgewater et al v. Obama et al
as 2:2012cv13942
Plaintiff:
Sharon Bridgewater, Specialty Investment Group, LLC, Specialty Global Investments, Inc and others
Defendant:
Barack Obama, Eric H. Holder, Jr., John Does 1-2, 4-5 and others
Bankson v. Morris
as 1:2012cv00041
Plaintiff:
Kurstyn Bankson
Defendant:
Scott M Morris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pamela Drawsand v. F.F. Properties, L.L.P., et al
as 11-17752
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PAMELA DRAWSAND
Defendant - Appellee:
F.F. PROPERTIES, L.L.P., FAIRFIELD BARRINGTON PROPERTIES, MONTELENA APARTMENT HOMES and others
Billups v. Bankson et al
as 4:2011cv02896
Petitioner:
David John Billups
Respondent:
Duwayne Bankson and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
